On Thursday, December 13, 2001 at 0:27, Eric Goldstein <koni-
omega@snoopy.cmagic.com>
wrote re "[KOML] Re: 220 film in 120 backs?" saying:
> Tom@Abacurial.com wrote:
>
> > You use the 120 film in the 220 back.
>
> Sorry Tom, I've lost the thread... what question are you answering here? Why
> would you want to shoot 120 film in a 220 KO mag?
There was discussion earlier about using 220 & 120 in the same back, at
different times of course.
If it's a 220 back, 120 will work, tho spacing between frames decreases.
For 220 in a 120 back....?
Tom
------- Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur -----------------
,__@ Tom A. Trottier +1 613 860-6633
fax:231-6115
_-\_<, 758 Albert St.,Ottawa Ont. Canada K1R
7V8
(*)/'(*) ICQ:57647974 Tom@Abacurial.com N45.412
W75.714
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Laws are the spider's webs which, if anything small falls
into them
they ensnare it, but large things break through and
escape.
--Solon, statesman (c.638-c558 BCE)
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." --
Benjamin Franklin
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 04/26/08 EDT