I've done a few weddings, but have used 35mm for those- more flexible, and I'm more comfortable with it. Works as well if you're only going to 8X10 anyway. I have used the RO for some portraits and landscape - I love the results. Haven't done anything important with digital yet. I'm stuck on film.
BF
>
> From: Eric Goldstein <egoldste@earthlink.net>
> Date: 2005/05/20 Fri PM 04:29:13 EDT
> To: Koni-Omega Mailing List <koni-omega@snoopy.cmagic.com>
> Subject: [KOML] Re: complete rapid m system
>
> Barry F wrote:
>
> > So that's one more reason why, some day, maybe I'll get an Omegaflex. But the
> > prices on those don't seem to be coming down as fast as the Rapid Omegas. Of
> > course, the lenses themselves don't seem to be quite as expensive for the
> > 'flex.
> > BF
>
>
> There are far more rangefinders.
>
> I would not want to shoot a wedding with a 'flex, but then again, I wouldn't
> want to shoot one with a C2, 220 or 330 and about a millions shooters did
> just that for years so go figure...
>
>
> Eric Goldstein
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 04/26/08 EDT